By the grace oif G-d
Moshe Never Died
Some people are puzzled by the fact that many Chassidim refer and relate to the Rebbe solely in the present tense. It appears to be a denial of the unfortunate reality of the past ten years; a refusal to accept the painful truth.
It is actually not a new phenomenon in Judaism that our righteous ones are considered alive even after their passing. In general, we do not use the term "death" to refer to any righteous person. Instead, we say "histalkut," meaning departure. Tzadikim do not die in the sense of leaving the world completely. Rather, as our sages say, they remain connected to their followers and students, and continue to protect them after their passing, in a sense even more than in their lifetimes. R. Schneur Zalmen of Liadi explains in Igeret Hakodesh that the lives of the righteous are more spiritual than physical; thus, when tzadikim pass on, they are released from physical boundaries and limitations, and are able to effect greater wonders than they ever could while they were alive.
Our sages say that Jacob our father did not die. Some understand this as referring to his children - when his descendents live with his teachings and inspiration, they keep him alive. The statement "David, King of Israel is alive forever" is part of Jewish liturgy and is a popular folk song. Thus, believing that our righteous ones live on forever is hardly a new trend.
However, in our generation this concept has been taken to a radically new level. Many Chassidim do not speak of the Rebbe using any term of departure or passing, and refer to him in the present tense.
Before attempting to analyze and explain this behavior, it is important to make note of one thing: We are not talking about a play on words, or of an attempt to escape reality. Chassidim are fully aware of the events that transpired on Gimmel Tamuz over ten years ago. However, over the course of our long history, Judaism has taught us that reality is not what our eyes see, but what the Torah teaches. The Torah is above the world and in fact brings the world into existence. Thus, it is impossible for the reality of the world to contradict the reality of Torah.
Every generation has a leader like Moses, who is like the "head" of the generation and grants energy to the entire nation, and is the Moshiach in his time. Our sages say, "Moses never died," since his soul is invested in the body of the Jewish leader of the generation. The Rebbe stated that our generation is the final generation of exile and the first of redemption, and that there will be no concept of "histalkut" or parting. Rather, the Rebbe will lead us directly to redemption.
True, it is very difficult for us to carry on in a situation where the Rebbe's presence is concealed from our eyes. However, the Rebbe gave us his promise that he is with us forever. We, as the Rebbe's emissaries and spiritual descendents, live constantly with his blessings and inspiration, and will continue to carry out his holy mission, until the final and complete revelation of Moshiach.
http://chabad.info/files/hageula/en/46_Chukat.pdf
Friday, July 08, 2005
Thursday, June 30, 2005
Open wound in good journalism.
By the grace of G-d
Shalom uBrocha!
Debra Nussbaum Cohen quoted me in her new article "Lubavitch’s Open Wound At 770" http://www.thejewishweek.com/news/newscontent.php3?artid=11082
While she did interview me over the phone few weeks ago:
"Rabbi Ariel Sokolovsky was among the men arrested Nov. 3. The Boston resident is an ardent messianist who visits 770 several times a year.
“I describe the rebbe as alive,” Rabbi Sokolovsky said in an interview. “The body of moshiach does not die, even if it appears to be so. A tzaddik [righteous person] can materialize himself in the world if he needs to. “Concealment does not mean that the rebbe has an invisible body,” he said. “It has to do with people’s readiness to see it. It’s people’s perception.”
Rabbi Sokolovsky said he has met people who have seen the rebbe in person since he died. "
It is just 1 quote from a half hour interview and a number of email exchanges. It doesn't convey the full meaning of my explanation to her about my understanding of the eternal life of Moshiach or the meaning of the statement that the body of Moshiach doesn't die.
If you have any questions about this please contact me for clarification.
With respect and blessing.
Ariel Sokolovsky
Long Live our Master our Teacher and our Rebbe King Moshiach Forever and Ever!
Shalom uBrocha!
Debra Nussbaum Cohen quoted me in her new article "Lubavitch’s Open Wound At 770" http://www.thejewishweek.com/news/newscontent.php3?artid=11082
While she did interview me over the phone few weeks ago:
"Rabbi Ariel Sokolovsky was among the men arrested Nov. 3. The Boston resident is an ardent messianist who visits 770 several times a year.
“I describe the rebbe as alive,” Rabbi Sokolovsky said in an interview. “The body of moshiach does not die, even if it appears to be so. A tzaddik [righteous person] can materialize himself in the world if he needs to. “Concealment does not mean that the rebbe has an invisible body,” he said. “It has to do with people’s readiness to see it. It’s people’s perception.”
Rabbi Sokolovsky said he has met people who have seen the rebbe in person since he died. "
It is just 1 quote from a half hour interview and a number of email exchanges. It doesn't convey the full meaning of my explanation to her about my understanding of the eternal life of Moshiach or the meaning of the statement that the body of Moshiach doesn't die.
If you have any questions about this please contact me for clarification.
With respect and blessing.
Ariel Sokolovsky
Long Live our Master our Teacher and our Rebbe King Moshiach Forever and Ever!
Sunday, June 26, 2005
The Lubavitcher Rebbe on: A Referendum
B"H
From the writings of The Lubavitcher Rebbe
The wording of the question, when they go to make a referendum on giving away territory!
“I suspect those who wish to solve the dispute on the retreat by making a referendum, because inherent danger lies in the very wording which will be offered. If they will come and ask the nation: “Are you prepared to give up land in return for peace?” - this would constitute a deliberate misleading of the voters, because by posing the question in this deceitful form, they are already slipping in half the response which they wish to elicit; as if to suggest that giving away land will bring peace.
If they are going for such a referendum, this should be only on condition that they will set out the wording in a form such as follows:
Is it worth while to place a life-threatening danger into every single home in Eretz Israel, to bring on the threat of war, with Israel left remaining without oil, without borders, without defense, with the enemy close to our major population centers, in return for the signature of Sadat (at the time this was said - translator), at a time when Egypt to this day has already betrayed their signature four times; and it is clear that Sadat will not live much longer and will not rule over Egypt for ever; and it is clear that he has no control over the Arabs in Yehuda and Shomron, and that the Arabs of Yehuda and Shomron announce publicly that their intention is to annihilate and kill all people who dwell in Zion. And it is clear that even were one group to agree to peace, other groups will not be in agreement – so the question is – given this situation, is it worth while to return lands in return for a piece of paper which obligates nobody?”
(From a private interview with Mr Shmuel Katz)
From the writings of The Lubavitcher Rebbe
The wording of the question, when they go to make a referendum on giving away territory!
“I suspect those who wish to solve the dispute on the retreat by making a referendum, because inherent danger lies in the very wording which will be offered. If they will come and ask the nation: “Are you prepared to give up land in return for peace?” - this would constitute a deliberate misleading of the voters, because by posing the question in this deceitful form, they are already slipping in half the response which they wish to elicit; as if to suggest that giving away land will bring peace.
If they are going for such a referendum, this should be only on condition that they will set out the wording in a form such as follows:
Is it worth while to place a life-threatening danger into every single home in Eretz Israel, to bring on the threat of war, with Israel left remaining without oil, without borders, without defense, with the enemy close to our major population centers, in return for the signature of Sadat (at the time this was said - translator), at a time when Egypt to this day has already betrayed their signature four times; and it is clear that Sadat will not live much longer and will not rule over Egypt for ever; and it is clear that he has no control over the Arabs in Yehuda and Shomron, and that the Arabs of Yehuda and Shomron announce publicly that their intention is to annihilate and kill all people who dwell in Zion. And it is clear that even were one group to agree to peace, other groups will not be in agreement – so the question is – given this situation, is it worth while to return lands in return for a piece of paper which obligates nobody?”
(From a private interview with Mr Shmuel Katz)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
